totallyferro.blogg.se

1. #VMWARE FREE VERSION VERSUS PAID FULL#
2. #VMWARE FREE VERSION VERSUS PAID WINDOWS 10#
3. #VMWARE FREE VERSION VERSUS PAID PROFESSIONAL#

#VMWARE FREE VERSION VERSUS PAID PROFESSIONAL#

#VMWARE FREE VERSION VERSUS PAID FULL#

Many customers never take full advantage of the many features that they are paying for and that can be avoided by being proactive in developing your overall vision for the infrastructure." Likewise, if you are going to spend more money on additional features, then have a plan to actually deploy and integrate those features into your infrastructure.

Many of my customers chose the lowest cost option only to discover that the additional funds needed to access even a few more features would have been money well spent. However, VMware is doing lots of great things." It really messes things up for us at times." "VMware vSphere could improve on the automation features and the ease of use of the solution in many areas, such as the interface. So, I'm really not happy with the extra fluff that is bundled in Windows 10. With Windows 7, the same ThinApp used to be close to 75 to 80 MB in size. A ThinApp that is roughly around 400 MB in size would take minutes to open up. We have offices spanning across Canada from the east coast to the west coast.

#VMWARE FREE VERSION VERSUS PAID WINDOWS 10#

Currently, with Windows 10 version that we have, it adds a lot of bulk to ThinApp. That is a good idea and VMware could profit from something like that for higher availability installations." "The pipeline feature can be improved, as it doesn't allow for specific situations." "It's an expensive solution." "I would like to see support for endpoint virtualization." "I would like to see more support regarding containers, and they need more features for them." "We've been using vSphere on Windows 7, and it had less fluff associated with ThinApp. "It would be useful to have features like micro-segmentation, changing the mix as well as part of vSphere" "An area for improvement is that when comparing VMware to Nutanix, Nutanix has higher availability, like clustering for virtual machines. In the physical boxes, if you don't require storage, it lies idle, but with VMware or any kind of virtualization, you can utilize the full storage." "Its stability and manageability are valuable." In vSAN, I can utilize the maximum storage. Its redundancy, uptime, or high-availability is also valuable. These are the two things which I like about it." "The most valuable features are stability and support." "It is the number one virtualization-layer platform available, and a lot of people trust it." "The enterprise direction is very complete and the data center provides almost everything you need." "Server Virtualization is the most important feature because that helps me to utilize 100% capacity of my physical server or box. "The solution is very straightforward to implement." "The most valuable features are the vMotion, the storage vMotion, the DRS, and the high availability function." "The features that I have found most valuable are the overall good ease of use and the good interface which makes it very easy to migrate from one bare metal to another.